Khazarian Satanic Porn — Plumbing New Depths


In this public You-tube clip, which is a digital recording of a VERY PUBLIC PRESENTATION at the 211 Conspiracy Conference, “Investigative Reporter” and consort of Leonard Horowitz, Sherri Kane maliciously attacked ex-VietNam war veteran Timothy White by accusing him of being a felon, rapist, and “cross-dresser”. Immediately, she realized that by attacking White, she had just venomously slurred a segment of the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender) crowd which she clearly holds in high esteem and obviously feels quite emotionally attached to.

After quickly pulling her foot out of her mouth by saying how much she “loves cross-dressers” – she then shows her true color and character. What kind of a “woman” would, in a public presentation, use the gutter-slang term “enjoying a big, BLACK DILDO up your a–” as if it is second nature to her?? Sherri Kane of course. Racial slur? Of course. (No such thing, in her twisted mind, of a big WHITE sex toy!) This is the vulgarly crude, conspiringly deceitful Khazarian woman who so desperately needs a restraining order against True Ott?? Who looks to the female praying mantis (who bites off the head of the male after mating) and black widow spider (who likewise kills the male) as her positive feminine role models to pattern all human behavior after?? And what is Leonard doing during all of this sick, gutter lingo? He’s laughing his fool head off – because it is clearly wonderfully fun entertainment to him. He’s not concerned in the least. This speaks volumes, folks. HUMANITARIANS? No way. SATANIC HUMANISTS? More than likely.

I have copies of the e-mails Ms. Kane references as she attacks me. Look closely at the screen display as well. Notice my name is CC’d —– I did not send these, nor did I originate them as she declares. She is lying, while the evidence is right on the screen in front of the audience. I did not ask to receive the e-mails. I was sent them because Kane had first publicly attacked me and my friend Don Nicoloff – who she had originally accused of killing Chris Story.

If she and Horowitz so brazenly lies about ME, how can anybody believe a word she says about Timothy White, or anybody else in her presentations and papers? Credibility? Completely gone!

Does the language and comfort level of the perversely sexual x-rated vernacular displayed by Sherri Kane in a professional and public forum, fit the following expose by Dr. Makow. I personally say, ABSOLUTELY.

http://www.henrymakow.com/

Lesbian porn, The Vagina Monologues” humiliates and degrades women in the name of feminism and social progress. This is how society is inducted into the Illuminati (satanic) cult.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Updated from Oct. 24, 21)

“The Vagina Monologues” presents a sad picture of life at the dead-end of feminism. It is an anguished cry for male love by a generation of women deceived by feminism, who now have no choice but to become lesbians.

For women who are literally starved for love, the play provides a steamy experience of sexual intimacy. For young women who don’t know any better, it is an initiation into lesbianism.

Based on interviews with women, who talk about their vaginas, the play purports to rescue the female genitals from “cultural neglect.” For example, the play describes a workshop in which women examine themselves with hand-mirrors.

“It reminded me of how early astronomers must have felt with their primitive telescopes,” says author, Eve Ensler (who lest we forget to mention, is Jewish.) They give their vagina nicknames, dress it up in imaginary outfits, and imagine what it would say if it could talk (e.g. “Where’s Brian?”). At one performance at the Madison Square Gardens, 18, women were whipped into a frenzy of shouting “cunt” over and over.

They should have been shouting “penis” because this is really about the loss of male love. Having lost their femininity and their youth, having rejected or emasculated men, millions of women are now left sexually high and dry.

Both sexes need validation. Men these days don’t like feminists and feminists know it. Every time we turn on TV, a man is being beat-up or shown-up by a woman. Men resent that women have usurped the male role and deserted the feminine one.

This is what Ensler is actually experiencing when she says: “Our self-hatred is only the internalized repression and hatred of the patriarchal culture.”

Women are justified in feeling unloved and unfulfilled. Ensler says that women want to be used for babies: “My vagina helped release a giant baby. It thought it would be used more than that. It’s not.”

The result is a profound sense of emptiness and need. “My vagina wants to go deeper. It’s hungry for depth. It’s hungry for kisses, kindness. It wants to stop being angry. It wants everything. It wants to want. It wants.”

It appears that only a man can staunch this wound. Ensler describes a boyfriend, Bob, who loved to gaze at her genitals for hours and made her feel good about herself for the first time. She doesn’t say what happened to Bob. The only other men in the play are Ensler’s first husband, a philanderer, and some rapists in Bosnia.

Thus, “The Vagina Monologues” quickly becomes a steamy chronicle of lesbian sex. In the first place, a fixation on female genitals by women is pure homosexuality. Forgive me for what follows but I am trying to convey the pornographic flavor of this so-called play.

The author interviews a former tax lawyer who has become wealthy as a lesbian gigolo. “There are so many unfulfilled women,” she says. “Women pay me to dress up like a man and dominate them.” She follows with a precise description of her art (“there are four fingers inside me, two are hers and two are mine”) that turns Ensler on: “Come on,” I said. “Come in.”

A 12-year-old girl describes how her mother entrusted her to the care of a beautiful, worldly 24-year-old woman who then betrayed this trust by having sex with her: “She transformed my sorry-assed coochie-snorcher into a kind of heaven.”

Ensler regresses with children stories of the “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” variety. She asks a six-year-old girl to say what her vagina smells like (snowflakes.) She informs us that the clitoris has twice the number of nerve fibers as the penis: “Who needs a handgun when you’ve got a semiautomatic?” She describes finding her clitoris for the first time: “It was all warm and pulsing and ready and young and alive.” I could go on but you get the idea.

ILLUMINATI BRAINWASHING

A measure of our cultural timidity, depravity and self-delusion is that no major media critic has named this play for what it is. “Ensler is an impassioned wit,” says The Los Angeles Times. “A compelling rhapsody of the female essence,” says The Chicago Tribune. “Spellbinding, funny and almost unbearably moving,” says Variety.

The play has been performed in hundreds of American cities and universities, and in countries from Rumania to Zaire. Celebrity guest performers include Meryl Streep, Jane Fonda, Calista Frockhart, and Angelica Huston.

It was performed in Sarajevo by Marisa Tomei and Glenn Close who said Ensler is “giving women their souls back.” Gillian Anderson (of the X-Files) says: “Eve Ensler is the Pied Piper. She is leading woman and the world to a different consciousness of women.”

Ensler and her entourage try to position this pitiable lesbian primer in the mainstream. Gloria Steinem writes “men as well as women will emerge from these pages feeling more free within themselves and about each other.”

It is typical of feminists to portray lesbianism as emancipation. Ensler has “come out” as yet another survivor of sexual abuse by her father. She has tied the play to the politicized cause of violence against women.

Her hatred of heterosexuality is evident by her choice of Valentine’s Day, as “V-Day” or anti-violence day, when her play will be performed. She told Molly Ivens in TIME that the patriarchal (i.e. nuclear) family is “a deadly institution.”

AGITPROP

These tactics are typical of Communist agitprop and a reflection of what we have become. The nuclear family is the primary institution of heterosexuality. Before the “sexual revolution,” women insisted on marriage and family, which is heterosexual behavior. This satisfied the profoundest psychological needs of both sexes and provided a safe context for raising healthy children. After the sexual revolution, men and women engaged in promiscuous sex, which had been more typical of homosexuals. Women, increasingly independent and self-righteous, were unable to form permanent marriages. Taught that they could “have it all”, they are now frustrated and bitter.

The irony of “The Vagina Monologues” is that feminists who regularly complain about sexual objectification embrace the play. There is no mention of love. This tendency to view sex as recreation and physical release reflects a self-destructive trend in society. Normally heterosexuals find sexual fulfillment in marriage and are able to turn their energies to more important things. Instead, we suffer from cultural arrested development manifested as a leering adolescent obsession with sex.

Another irony is that feminists apparently think that, when lesbians do it, an adult having sex with a 12-year-old child is OK. They also think that they can violate the natural innocence of a 6-year-old girl with invasive questions.

Finally, need I mention that the play outrages and destroys the mystery, modesty and reserve that is the essence of mature femininity? Like feminism itself, “The Vagina Monologues” masquerades as an affirmation of women. In fact, it is a sickening assault on women.

We must face the fact that feminism is a homosexual movement in deadly competition with heterosexuality. It is part of a wider covert war aimed at subverting Western civilization and enslaving society.

http://www.henrymakow.com/

Lesbian porn, The Vagina Monologues” humiliates and degrades women in the name of feminism and social progress. This is how society is inducted into the Illuminati (satanic) cult.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Updated from Oct. 24, 21)

“The Vagina Monologues” presents a sad picture of life at the dead-end of feminism. It is an anguished cry for male love by a generation of women deceived by feminism, who now have no choice but to become lesbians.

For women who are literally starved for love, the play provides a steamy experience of sexual intimacy. For young women who don’t know any better, it is an initiation into lesbianism.

Based on interviews with women, who talk about their vaginas, the play purports to rescue the female genitals from “cultural neglect.” For example, the play describes a workshop in which women examine themselves with hand-mirrors.

“It reminded me of how early astronomers must have felt with their primitive telescopes,” says author, Eve Ensler (who lest we forget to mention, is Jewish.) They give their vagina nicknames, dress it up in imaginary outfits, and imagine what it would say if it could talk (e.g. “Where’s Brian?”). At one performance at the Madison Square Gardens, 18, women were whipped into a frenzy of shouting “cunt” over and over.

They should have been shouting “penis” because this is really about the loss of male love. Having lost their femininity and their youth, having rejected or emasculated men, millions of women are now left sexually high and dry.

Both sexes need validation. Men these days don’t like feminists and feminists know it. Every time we turn on TV, a man is being beat-up or shown-up by a woman. Men resent that women have usurped the male role and deserted the feminine one.

This is what Ensler is actually experiencing when she says: “Our self-hatred is only the internalized repression and hatred of the patriarchal culture.”

Women are justified in feeling unloved and unfulfilled. Ensler says that women want to be used for babies: “My vagina helped release a giant baby. It thought it would be used more than that. It’s not.”

The result is a profound sense of emptiness and need. “My vagina wants to go deeper. It’s hungry for depth. It’s hungry for kisses, kindness. It wants to stop being angry. It wants everything. It wants to want. It wants.”

It appears that only a man can staunch this wound. Ensler describes a boyfriend, Bob, who loved to gaze at her genitals for hours and made her feel good about herself for the first time. She doesn’t say what happened to Bob. The only other men in the play are Ensler’s first husband, a philanderer, and some rapists in Bosnia.

Thus, “The Vagina Monologues” quickly becomes a steamy chronicle of lesbian sex. In the first place, a fixation on female genitals by women is pure homosexuality. Forgive me for what follows but I am trying to convey the pornographic flavor of this so-called play.

The author interviews a former tax lawyer who has become wealthy as a lesbian gigolo. “There are so many unfulfilled women,” she says. “Women pay me to dress up like a man and dominate them.” She follows with a precise description of her art (“there are four fingers inside me, two are hers and two are mine”) that turns Ensler on: “Come on,” I said. “Come in.”

A 12-year-old girl describes how her mother entrusted her to the care of a beautiful, worldly 24-year-old woman who then betrayed this trust by having sex with her: “She transformed my sorry-assed coochie-snorcher into a kind of heaven.”

Ensler regresses with children stories of the “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” variety. She asks a six-year-old girl to say what her vagina smells like (snowflakes.) She informs us that the clitoris has twice the number of nerve fibers as the penis: “Who needs a handgun when you’ve got a semiautomatic?” She describes finding her clitoris for the first time: “It was all warm and pulsing and ready and young and alive.” I could go on but you get the idea.

ILLUMINATI BRAINWASHING

A measure of our cultural timidity, depravity and self-delusion is that no major media critic has named this play for what it is. “Ensler is an impassioned wit,” says The Los Angeles Times. “A compelling rhapsody of the female essence,” says The Chicago Tribune. “Spellbinding, funny and almost unbearably moving,” says Variety.

The play has been performed in hundreds of American cities and universities, and in countries from Rumania to Zaire. Celebrity guest performers include Meryl Streep, Jane Fonda, Calista Frockhart, and Angelica Huston.

It was performed in Sarajevo by Marisa Tomei and Glenn Close who said Ensler is “giving women their souls back.” Gillian Anderson (of the X-Files) says: “Eve Ensler is the Pied Piper. She is leading woman and the world to a different consciousness of women.”

Ensler and her entourage try to position this pitiable lesbian primer in the mainstream. Gloria Steinem writes “men as well as women will emerge from these pages feeling more free within themselves and about each other.”

It is typical of feminists to portray lesbianism as emancipation. Ensler has “come out” as yet another survivor of sexual abuse by her father. She has tied the play to the politicized cause of violence against women.

Her hatred of heterosexuality is evident by her choice of Valentine’s Day, as “V-Day” or anti-violence day, when her play will be performed. She told Molly Ivens in TIME that the patriarchal (i.e. nuclear) family is “a deadly institution.”

AGITPROP

These tactics are typical of Communist agitprop and a reflection of what we have become. The nuclear family is the primary institution of heterosexuality. Before the “sexual revolution,” women insisted on marriage and family, which is heterosexual behavior. This satisfied the profoundest psychological needs of both sexes and provided a safe context for raising healthy children. After the sexual revolution, men and women engaged in promiscuous sex, which had been more typical of homosexuals. Women, increasingly independent and self-righteous, were unable to form permanent marriages. Taught that they could “have it all”, they are now frustrated and bitter.

The irony of “The Vagina Monologues” is that feminists who regularly complain about sexual objectification embrace the play. There is no mention of love. This tendency to view sex as recreation and physical release reflects a self-destructive trend in society. Normally heterosexuals find sexual fulfillment in marriage and are able to turn their energies to more important things. Instead, we suffer from cultural arrested development manifested as a leering adolescent obsession with sex.

Another irony is that feminists apparently think that, when lesbians do it, an adult having sex with a 12-year-old child is OK. They also think that they can violate the natural innocence of a 6-year-old girl with invasive questions.

Finally, need I mention that the play outrages and destroys the mystery, modesty and reserve that is the essence of mature femininity? Like feminism itself, “The Vagina Monologues” masquerades as an affirmation of women. In fact, it is a sickening assault on women.

We must face the fact that feminism is a homosexual movement in deadly competition with heterosexuality. It is part of a wider covert war aimed at subverting Western civilization and enslaving society.


5 responses to “Khazarian Satanic Porn — Plumbing New Depths”

  1. You may have some beef with Sherry Kane and Horowitz, but Tim Wise is definitely a yid provocateur who hates white non-jews and constantly makes up lies and spins tall tales about white ‘neo-nazi’s’ & ‘anti-semite’s’ under every bed. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Every year an average of 38,54 white women are raped by black men in the U.S. Despite whites outnumbering blacks almost 4 to 1. The average amount of black women raped in a year by white males is̷.. ZERO!! (DOJ,FBI) 25 there was initially 9 rapes, but it was discovered later 4 were jews & 1 was latino. Irregardless, even if the 9 were all white, why is it no one knows about this? It’s beyond the stage of an epidemic and has been for years. The fact the jewish owned media doesn’t tell us about these facts should make you think real hard. Whites, men especially, have been demonized by the jewish media for a long time now. From Homer Simpson to Beavis and Butthead and beyond.

  2. It matters not whom they are. They apply rules to americans that state that they have a right to insult and imprison at times, therefor in retro-active response they are not american in the country of north america. This states that they are an army resistance using guerrila warfare. They are termites and this country is the wood. It is too full of holes now and needs the termites burned out. The night of red sun approaches and the black spot is apon them. There is no escape from the situation they themselves have made on orders inherent. They are expendable and serve no security to this country and therefor no other country as well.

  3. A word of note to those that claim what is not theres to begin with.
    The Royal Bloodline Of David

    No child in Coniahs line could rule upon the throne of David. This same truth is stated again in 2 Kings 24:5-15, only here Coniah is named Jehoiachin. Second Kings states that after Jehoiakim’s death, Jehoiachin (also called Coniah or Jeconiah), his son, reigned. And Jehoiachin did evil in the sight of the Lord (vs. 6-9). Just what evil the king committed we are not told. But true to God’s word, Babylon conquered Judah and took the king and his family and the treasures of Solomon into captivity. The prophecy concludes with,
    “And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king’s mother, and the king’s wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon” (2 Kings 24:15).
    Did Jehoiachin have sons? Yes, he did, but none ever reigned in Judah as king. Because of this curse, Israel has not had a monarchy from the time of the Babylonian captivity until now.
    In Matthew chapter one we are given the genealogy of Jesus Christ. His line rightly goes through David’s father, and then through David himself, and then through Solomon. Notice carefully the genealogical line after Solomon.
    “Josiah begot Jeconiah and his brothers, about the time they were carried away to Babylon” (Matt. 1:11).
    Here is the mention of Jeconiah. The line involving Jeconiah ended with a carpenter named Joseph the husband of a young virgin named Mary.
    “And Jacob begot Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus who is called Christ” (Matt. 1:16).
    Joseph was in Jeconiah’s line. So if Jesus Christ were to be the legitimate king in Israel, it would have been impossible for him to be the natural son of Joseph. Joseph was a sinner and under the curse imposed upon his genetic line through Jeconiah. This makes it impossible for Joseph to have been the physical father of Jesus Christ. . .